| | 255 | ==== Benchmark Results ==== |
| | 256 | {{{ |
| | 257 | # OpenLdap VS MySQL, Quad core 6600. 10k entries, 4 values |
| | 258 | s/iter LDAP DB |
| | 259 | LDAP 3.62 -- -98% |
| | 260 | DB 7.00e-02 5074% -- |
| | 261 | |
| | 262 | # OpenLdap VS MySQL , Dual core E2140, 10k entries, 4 values |
| | 263 | s/iter LDAP DB |
| | 264 | LDAP 7.29 -- -98% |
| | 265 | DB 0.172 4151% -- |
| | 266 | |
| | 267 | ################################################# |
| | 268 | |
| | 269 | # OpenLdap Dual core E2140, 2k entries, 104 values |
| | 270 | s/iter |
| | 271 | LDAP 3.51 |
| | 272 | |
| | 273 | # OpenLdap, Dual core E2140, 2k entries, 4 values |
| | 274 | s/iter |
| | 275 | LDAP 1.28 |
| | 276 | |
| | 277 | ################################################# |
| | 278 | |
| | 279 | # OpenLdap vs FedoraDS, Dual core E2140, 10k entries 4 values |
| | 280 | s/iter OpenLDAP Fedora DS |
| | 281 | OpenLDAP 6.85 -- -14% |
| | 282 | Fedora DS 5.86 17% -- |
| | 283 | |
| | 284 | # OpenLdap vs FedoraDS, Dual core E2140, 2k entries 104 values |
| | 285 | s/iter OpenLDAP Fedora DS |
| | 286 | OpenLDAP 3.44 -- -13% |
| | 287 | Fedora DS 3.01 14% -- |
| | 288 | |
| | 289 | ################################################ |
| | 290 | #################### Ruby #################### |
| | 291 | ################################################ |
| | 292 | |
| | 293 | # OpenLdap vs MySQL, Quad core 6600, 10k entries 4 values |
| | 294 | user system total real |
| | 295 | LDAP 10.440000 0.790000 11.230000 ( 11.566221) |
| | 296 | DB 0.350000 0.020000 0.370000 ( 0.368707) |
| | 297 | }}} |
